Home » Pharmaceuticals » Vaccination as a Condition of Employment: Evaluating Legal Risks of Mandatory Vaccine Policies During the Pandemic — Strategic HR Solutions

Vaccination as a Condition of Employment: Evaluating Legal Risks of Mandatory Vaccine Policies During the Pandemic — Strategic HR Solutions

Issues Pending:

Archives

Recent Comments

What's the most conv… on Free Medical Malpractice Case…
Christen Rounds on Contact Us
Mayra Lockhart on Contact Us
Hilda on Are you being Prescribed High…
SW Cali Wildlife Fou… on Are you being Prescribed High…

With coronavirus vaccines receiving their emergency use authorizations from the FDA and being rapidly rolled out, employers will need to evaluate a mandatory vaccination policy that balances employee rights with novel business realities and pre-existing legal frameworks lacking clear guidance in the face of COVID-19.

Under existing federal law and regulations, employers may be able to institute mandatory vaccination policies to protect health and safety in the workplace. Although a mandatory vaccine policy is not completely free from legal risk, courts more recently have upheld vaccination requirements when an employer shows that the need for vaccine-acquired immunity is job-related, consistent with business necessity, and not more intrusive than necessary. Other constitutional challenges to the vaccine may occur, but such challenges could be influenced significantly by government and public sentiment likely to affect an outcome with the courts.

Current CDC guidance has identified frontline healthcare workers, workers in essential industries, and other high-risk individuals based on individual health factors as groups that will likely receive the earliest allocations of COVID-19 vaccines if demand outpaces supply, as expected. Employers with workers in the first two categories will likely have the strongest case for job-relatedness and business necessity when instituting a mandatory vaccination policy. But employers in other sectors may also be able to make a compelling case for mandatory vaccinations.

Proactive Consideration of Medical and Religious Accommodations

All employers implementing mandatory vaccine policies should consider (and train staff for) employees’ potential requests for medical or religious accommodations. For employers covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), mandatory medical “examinations” (including a requirement that employees receive vaccines) may require reasonable accommodations for employees with certain disabilities, unless the employer can show that the employee poses a “direct threat” (i.e., a significant risk of substantial harm that cannot be reduced or eliminated by reasonable accommodation) to their own health or to others in the workplace. Similarly, employers covered by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 may need to accommodate, absent direct threat, employees with religious objections to vaccination generally or to the specific production method of the then-available COVID-19 vaccine.

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) determined in March 2020 that COVID-19’s “direct threat” to workers’ health justified employers’ medical examinations of employees, including more in-depth health-related questions, medical screening before allowing employees to report to work, and other similar conduct. This same finding of the direct threat posed by COVID-19 in the workplace may justify a mandatory vaccination policy for most employees as well.

When faced with employees requesting medical or religious accommodations (supported by appropriate documentation), employers will need to determine whether any potential accommodation either (a) would not sufficiently reduce or eliminate the direct threat posed by the pandemic or (b) would impose an undue hardship on the employer.

But these standards of accommodation, threat, and hardship will vary both under federal law and in the relevant factual scenarios of each employer. Under the ADA, for instance, undue hardship requires an employer to show that a reasonable accommodation for a medically-objecting employee would cause significant difficulty or expense after consideration of several factors. Under Title VII, undue hardship for religious accommodations need only meet a “de minimis test,” meaning that an employer would show that the accommodation imposed a more than minimal cost to demonstrate undue hardship in accommodating an employee objecting to vaccination on religious grounds. Because of these variations, federal law could require an employer to accommodate a disabled employee but not an employee demanding an accommodation for religious observance.

Further complicating these matters are the patchwork of state and local regulations of the workplace. For instance, in California, the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) provides greater protection for an employee making a request for a religious accommodation than under Title VII. Rather than the federal “de minimis” test for undue hardship of religious accommodations, California employers will need to evaluate the hardship presented by accommodations under a significant difficulty or expense factor-test similar to the federal ADA standard.

Practical Considerations

While employers await guidance on COVID-19 vaccination from applicable state and federal authorities, there are some practical issues employers should consider now regarding an approach to vaccination, including:

  • While mandating vaccination presents challenges related to medical and religious accommodations, the absence of a mandatory policy is not without cost. Without adopting a vaccination program, employers may face claims under the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA), or tort or workers’ compensation claims for failing to meet the obligation to provide a safe and healthy work environment.
  • Employers should encourage and incentivize workers to get vaccinated. Measures to promote employee vaccination could include: (1) outreach to company group health insurers to inquire whether the vaccine is covered by the group policy, (2) stipends or reimbursements for vaccination, (3) guidance on where to get vaccines (when vaccines become more widely available), (4) allowing employees to use PTO and other applicable leave to provide time off necessary to get vaccinated, and (5) demonstrations of personal commitment by company executives (e.g. sharing educational materials or testimonials concerning vaccination). Such incentives are particularly germane for those employers who decide that a mandatory vaccination policy may not fit with business necessity or company culture.
  • Create a thoughtful vaccination policy and enforce this policy as consistently and uniformly as possible. While employers should work within existing frameworks to consider religious and medical accommodations on a case-by-case basis, selective enforcement of a vaccination policy could lead to disparate treatment discrimination claims.
  • Stay mindful of state and local laws, regulations, and orders concerning vaccinations and reopening plans. Employers with locations across multiple jurisdictions will have to tailor policies to account for variations among state and local authorities.
  • Employers in a unionized setting will need to consider how a vaccination policy will fit within applicable collective bargaining agreements or trigger bargaining obligations.

In the vacuum of clear and controlling federal, state, and local guidance and with many questions unanswered as to the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines for those who receive doses, employers considering vaccine mandates as part of their return-to-work plans or as an enhancement to workplace health and safety as the vaccines become increasingly available should consult with our team of HR professionals to evaluate appropriate policies and accommodations issues.

With coronavirus vaccines receiving their emergency use authorizations from the FDA and being rapidly rolled out, employers will need to evaluate a mandatory vaccination policy that balances employee rights with novel business realities and pre-existing legal frameworks lacking clear guidance in the face of COVID-19. Under existing federal law and regulations, employers may be able […]

Vaccination as a Condition of Employment: Evaluating Legal Risks of Mandatory Vaccine Policies During the Pandemic — Strategic HR Solutions

Recent Posts: SW Laws blog \ Referrals

How Big Pharma Fueled the Opioid Crisis That Killed 500,000 and Counting via Democracy Now

How Big Pharma Fueled the Opioid Crisis That Killed 500,000 and Counting via  Democracy Now

As the U.S. continues to deal with the fallout from devastating the opioid epidemic that has killed over 500,000 people in the country since 1999, we speak with Academy Award-winning filmmaker Alex Gibney, whose latest documentary, “The Crime of the Century,” looks at the pharmaceutical industry’s methods in promoting and selling these powerful drugs. “I […]

The tone of voice to use when talking about forensic mistakes via Bredemarket

Remember my post that discussed the tone of voice that a company chooses to use when talking about the benefits of the company and its offerings? Or perhaps you saw the repurposed version of the post, a page section entitled “Don’t use that tone of voice with me!” The tone of voice that a firm […] […]

Types of Distribution Channels. AKA Sourcing the Product via Jessie Kimball

Types of Distribution Channels. AKA Sourcing the Product via Jessie Kimball

This week has been a bit better than last, but I still feel a bit overwhelmed. There are so many options and I want to be sure I choose the best option for me. It is great that we are assigned to research our choices though because if I had to just choose one over […] […]

How to Get a Divorce Online without an attorney via Market Business News

The family life of a man and a woman has its ups and downs, and sometimes, no matter how hard the spouses try, things just don’t work out, and the only option left is filing for divorce. It can be a scary time with lots of questions. You may be worried about the length of… How […]

More on Wordpress

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Blog:: Forensic Files

Forensic Science and its 9 Governing Principles via The Legal Conundrum

Forensic Science and its 9 Governing Principles via The Legal Conundrum

The word ‘forensic’ is derived from the Latin word ‘forensis’ that relates to a discussion or examination performed in public. Forensic science is the application of science and the scientific method to matters of law and resolution of legal conflicts. It is a multi-disciplinary subject which draws upon physics, chemistry, biology, computer science and other […]

Communicating benefits to customers (Part 4 of 3) — Bredemarket

[Link to part 1] | [Link to part 2] | [Link to part 3] I knew I’d think of something else after I thought this whole post series was complete. But this post will be brief. Benefit statements are not only affected by the target customers, but are also affected by the “personality” of the […] […]

Single Fingerprint At A Crime Scene Detects Class A Drug Usage via Uncover Reality

The latest findings show that with clever science, a single fingerprint left at a crime scene could be used to determine whether someone has touched or ingested class A drugs. In a paper published in Royal Society of Chemistry’s Analyst journal, a team of researchers at the University of Surrey, in collaboration with the National Centre […]